The postmodernist mindset is hugely influenced by romanticism.
|
![]() |
|
Shelley proclaimed that . . . |
||
| In many ways the postmodernist mindset is hugely influenced by romanticism. Shelley proclaimed that “love is free: to promise for ever to love the same woman is not less absurd than to believe the same creed.” German theologian Schleiermacher believed that each person should have their own custom-built religion! The central commandment of romanticism was – “Be unique! Be yourself”. This fundamental declaration of autonomy resonates loudly and clearly with postmodernist citizens. In the 18th century poets and thinkers like Shelley and Schleiermacher were shunned and rebuffed by ordinary folk. Their ideas were scandalous and outrageous. Now it is an everyday occurrence to meet ordinary people who embrace autonomy in this radical sense. |
||
![]() |
Girls as young as eight proclaim that ... “I think I believe in reincarnation……a bit.” Somehow the belief in reincarnation has become an item in a fancy dress shop. We try it on for size as we giggle and smirk. Somehow it’s entertaining to toy with an exotic belief. Ten minutes later we are bored and so we summon other beliefs to play with. |
|
| << What would you rather bee or a wasp? | ||
| In many ways the spirit of postmodernism can be understood as a radicalisation of romanticism. Very often the 18th century romantic was idealistic and charged with Neoplatonism, nature worship and gushing sincerity. This mindset can still be found today but the deepest impulses of postmodernism have a far more malleable and plastic understanding of belief. As we have already noted, we construct the world with our beliefs. We are magicians who conjure worlds from practically nothing. |
||
| It is vital to understand precisely why so many 18th century romantics rebelled against the science worship of the Enlightenment. Sensitive, thoughtful men and women understood what we have called the Cronus feature of modern science. Naturalistic science threatens to swallow up our cravings for freedom, morality and significance. A similar theme is emerging in postmodernism. |
||
| The modernist can be understood as a person who discovers the facts and constructs the values. Science is factual and everything else is a construct. The postmodernist, on the other hand, does not want to be told that genes or the environment determine our behaviour. This scientific necessity undermines our proud autonomy. She waves a dismissive hand and cries – “Let’s construct both the facts and the values.” |
||
|
|
||